I have been playing around with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 for a few weeks now and so I thought I would post some of my thoughts about this new camera. For my first test footage, please watch the GH1 Picnic! video previously posted to this blog. As well, take a look at the Anton Bauer UL2 head replacement video which was also shot on the GH1. They are two great and different examples of what this camera is capable of.
This is in no way an attempt at a proper, exhaustive and/or highly technical review. For that, I would recommend you read the extremely in-depth review at Dpreview, found here.
First, a little history:
The GH1 is 12.1 MP digital camera with a Micro Four Thirds lens mount. It is different from all other DSLRs because… in reality, it’s not a DSLR. Digital and film SLR’s have a mirror that allows the optical viewfinder to view through the camera’s lens. The GH1 and its predecessor, the G1, are a ground up re-working of the interchangeable lens digital still camera concept. These cameras have no mirrors and have only an electronic view finder and LCD. Removing the mirror-box allows the cameras to be much, much thinner and lighter. This design results in an incredible short back flange distance which allows users to (using various adapters) mount almost any lens imaginable (sensor coverage is another story). Speaking of the sensor… it is half the size of a 35mm still photography negative and much, much larger then 1/3” or 2/3” sensors.
Now, a quick list of what makes this little cam exciting on paper (at least to me):
My experiences, thus far:
I have thoroughly enjoyed using this camera to take both stills and video. I have been shooting a lot of test videos and have been mainly using vintage Canon FD manual focus prime lenses with an adapter I bought from eBAY. I have been using Tiffen ND and polarizing filters to allow my aperture to stay large for the DOF characteristics. I have been transcoding my footage to Apple Pro Res 422 and editing in Final Cut Pro.
Pros:
Cons:
The biggest issue for me so far, is the CMOS sensor’s tendency to show fixed pattern noise in underexposed areas (more noticeably at higher ISOs) When filming in low light situations that contain flat surfaces of consistent colour, vertical streaks can appear over areas that are under exposed. However, if you’re able to achieve a properly exposed image, even at 1600 ISO the image is excellent though… it seems to affect underexposed areas most and I’m still learning about this phenomenon and how to work around it.
Conclusion, thus far:
This camera is great… for me. This camera may not be great for you. If it is not suitable for your purposes, then select a camera that is. I will use it shoot narrative pieces and web content with (what I expect will be) stunning results. I’ve been using mostly the 720/60P mode and dropping the extra frames to get 24P. This process nets me the best resolution to compression artifact ratio.
It is not a dedicated video camera and so obviously it lacks a lot of things people are used to. Things like; XLR inputs, controllable audio gain, built-in NDs, servo zoom, the usual ergonomics.
So, no, it’s NOT perfect… but then again it’s a consumer camera with interchangeable lenses and a 4K sensor that’s almost as big as motion picture film… for less then $2,000.
* I will continue to post updates and footage as I become more familiar with the camera. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have *
Hello. Thank you for this great info! Keep up the good job!
thank you! I really liked this post!
Thanks for the review.
Mine is in the post. Can’t wait.
Great review! Does this have the option of being able to use a lavelier mic?